But this being America in 2018, the philosophy of yin and yang means that for this bit of good news (the chief will be benched from uniforms but not from team merchandise), there is a balancing blast of bad news, which came at practically the same time. I saw a post on Facebook sharing a god-awful item from Walmart.com, a “Kids China Boy Costume,” complete with a photo of a young white boy dressed in an inappropriate, culturally appropriate and inexcusably phony polyester suit with baggy pants, a Mandarin-collared shirt with Chinese-style knot buttons and a matching hat (which is sold separately to “improve your costume”).
There’s been lively discussion about the item, which is currently sold out, by the way, on my Facebook page. An old friend from school pointed out the “hat sold separately” line, which actually seems hilarious to me. Why the hell would someone just buy the hat? Someone else who speaks Chinese (sorry, Nicholas, I forget if you speak Mandarin or Cantonese, or both) pointed out that the Chinese characters on the shirt are gibberish. Another pointed out that upon close inspection, you can see that the kid has mascara to make his eyes look slanted!
Most people who saw it on Facebook think it’s awful, but one friend who I respect asked why the costume made me angry. She said that when she was young, she loved learning about other countries and their cultures, and she studied how people dressed around the world. She also had dolls in native costumes — hopefully, they were accurate and culturally respectful and educational.
I know, or hope, the child in the catalog photo is innocent. I doubt he understands anything about what he’s wearing. Hopefully, he didn’t go around saying, “Ching-Chong!” while posing for the photo shoot.
But the child isn’t buying this stuff — it’s parents buying it for their children.
By doing that, parents perpetuate stereotypes of what Asians are like — it keeps Asian Americans as permanent foreigners, always the Other. Something exotic. Not really American. Ever.
If these costumes were accurate and came with some real history that a child could learn from, that might be acceptable. But really, when I (and I think most Asian Americans) see stuff like this, our stomachs clench because in our heads, we hear the taunts of “Ching-Chong Chinaman!” and “Remember Pearl Harbor!” — both are phrases hurled at me most of my life by ignorant kids whose parents probably bought them costumes like this to “play” the part of a “Chinaman.”
On top of all that, the fact that this kid’s eyes are painted to look slanty just makes me want to throw up. …
No, I don’t think this kid is racist, or his parents, or anyone who had a childhood fascination for other cultures. That fascination is great; I wish more people had that and learned about the world. But I doubt any kids and their parents who think this costume is cool and worth spending $24 on ($40 list price!) is curious about world cultures. They’re just on an ignorant path.
They’re not looking for knowledge about China or Chinese history. They’re using the most shallow and fake surface elements to convey “Chineseness.” If it were easy to put on yellow makeup (imagine a costume where a kid would put on blackface to appear African-American), I bet they’d do that in a second.
Now, going to that step would make them flat-out racist.
Walmart, go through your online vendors and clean out all the crap. It was just a few months ago when a Walmart vendor sold framed photos of Japanese American concentration camps as perfect wall decor, after all. We haven’t forgotten.
Is there a pattern here?
NOTE: While I’m at it, let’s not let Amazon off the hook. Search for “China Boy Costume” on Amazon.com, and you won’t find the Walmart special (oddly, the search results show lots of fake glasses — what’s with that???).
But Amazon in the U.K. is under fire for a vendor selling “Asian” costumes with white kids wearing them while they pull their eyes back in a slant — another stupid unoriginal trick that was shown to me many times growing up.
Come on, world, GROW UP!
UPDATE: The costume (and the JA concentration camp photos from before) were sold by third-party vendors through Walmart.com. After JACL Executive Director David Inoue contacted the company, Walmart has removed the costume, along with other offensive items it found when it did a review. Walmart is reworking its vendor rules to prevent similar incidents.
Gil Asakawa is chair of the Editorial Board of the Pacific Citizen and author of “Being Japanese American” (second edition Stone Bridge Press, 2015). He blogs at www.nikkeiview.com.